Cooptation= rewards used to induce change in attitude towards unethical behavs. subtle coz inds may nt realise how the rewards hav induced them to resolve ambiguity that pervades issues in a manner that suits their self-interests.
incrementalism= gradually introduced to corrupt acts. initially induced to perform something that is slightly deviant, then inds quickly grab at the available rationalisations offered by peers to reduce dissonance. Then as they come to accept the acts as normal, they are introduced to another more corrupt act, with the attendant rationalisations.
Compromise= Individuals back into corruption through attempts to resolve pressing dilemmas, role conflicts and other intractable problems.
newcomers are more likely to accept corrupt acts as justifiable if not desirable if they perceive that they choose their own curse of action.
----------------------------------------
Irritating. Selfish human nature.
Don't want to feel guilty. So push the blame to others. Make up lies to fake innocence.
YET want to be in control. Want to feel that they have a choice BUT if it's justifiable AND I'm-not-at-fault-someone-else-is mindset is/can be in place, i don't mind..
No comments:
Post a Comment